Ming Teck Park
Every landed sale recorded on Ming Teck Park (D10), plus every landed home within a 1km radius — so you can price this street against its immediate surroundings.
92
caveats on this street
$2,466
median land $psf
$6.72M
median price
63
rebuild permits on record
URA landed housing area
2-Storey Mixed Landed — terraces, semi-detached or detached are all permitted — the most flexible but densest landed form. Held to a 2-storey building envelope.Source: URA Master Plan Landed Housing Area (data.gov.sg). Indicative — confirm the exact envelope and setbacks with URA before any purchase or rebuild.
2-Storey Mixed Landed — terraces, semi-detached or detached are all permitted — the most flexible but densest landed form. Held to a 2-storey building envelope.Source: URA Master Plan Landed Housing Area (data.gov.sg). Indicative — confirm the exact envelope and setbacks with URA before any purchase or rebuild.
Dot colour = median land $psf (greener = lower, amber = higher); orange ring = rebuild activity (thicker = more permissions); dashed circle = the 1km comparable radius. Tap a dot to open that street.
Transactions on this street
The most recent 50 of 92 landed caveats on Ming Teck Park (land area in sqft; $psf on land). The Rebuild column flags a sale whose exact address has a URA rebuild permission — with the estimated completion year, so you can gauge how new the house is; 35 here carry one.
| Date | Address | Type | Land sqft | Price | $psf | Rebuild |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Apr 26 | 82 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 2,065 | $6.25M | $3,026 | – |
| 7 Apr 26 | 68 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 3,639 | $9.00M | $2,473 | ↻ rebuilt ~2003 |
| 29 Jan 26 | 85 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,388 | $8.00M | $2,361 | – |
| 29 Dec 25 | 51 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,314 | $8.10M | $2,444 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2027 |
| 17 Oct 25 | 54 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,858 | $7.73M | $4,160 | ↻ rebuilt ~2025 |
| 10 Oct 25 | 31 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,515 | $8.65M | $2,460 | – |
| 2 Jul 25 | 109 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,943 | $6.18M | $3,181 | – |
| 27 Dec 24 | 27 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,208 | $10.69M | $3,332 | ↻ rebuilt ~2024 |
| 4 Sep 24 | 24 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,336 | $8.50M | $2,548 | ↻ rebuilt ~2004 |
| 8 Dec 23 | 93 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 2,019 | $6.10M | $3,022 | – |
| 22 Sep 23 | 79 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,347 | $8.53M | $2,548 | ↻ rebuilt ~2007 |
| 19 Jul 23 | 54 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,858 | $4.50M | $2,422 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2025 |
| 28 Apr 23 | 92 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,988 | $4.20M | $2,113 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2026 |
| 28 Feb 23 | 50 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 2,657 | $6.00M | $2,258 | – |
| 27 Jan 23 | 103 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 3,146 | $5.70M | $1,812 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2026 |
| 7 Dec 22 | 113 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 2,009 | $5.88M | $2,927 | ↻ rebuilt ~2010 |
| 8 Sep 22 | 65 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,322 | $6.90M | $2,077 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2027 |
| 4 Aug 22 | 27 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,208 | $6.55M | $2,042 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2024 |
| 19 Oct 21 | 95 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,936 | $4.75M | $2,454 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2024 |
| 20 Sep 21 | 67 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,356 | $7.00M | $2,086 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2024 |
| 6 Sep 21 | 91 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 2,206 | $5.75M | $2,606 | ↻ rebuilt ~2020 |
| 7 May 21 | 97 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,872 | $4.80M | $2,564 | ↻ rebuilt ~2016 |
| 12 Jan 21 | 4 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,320 | $5.08M | $1,530 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2024 |
| 8 Jul 20 | 41 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,714 | $5.82M | $1,567 | – |
| 4 Sep 19 | 6 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,299 | $5.50M | $1,667 | – |
| 24 Jul 19 | 31 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,515 | $5.60M | $1,593 | – |
| 17 Jun 19 | 66 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 3,501 | $5.00M | $1,428 | – |
| 29 Nov 18 | 48 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,757 | $3.38M | $1,924 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2021 |
| 9 May 18 | 63 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,321 | $5.50M | $1,656 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2020 |
| 3 Nov 17 | 33 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,597 | $5.45M | $1,515 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2020 |
| 5 Oct 17 | 91 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 2,207 | $2.90M | $1,314 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2020 |
| 2 Dec 16 | 22 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,315 | $5.30M | $1,599 | – |
| 3 Oct 16 | 98 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,957 | $3.21M | $1,640 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2020 |
| 12 Aug 15 | 8 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,341 | $5.56M | $1,664 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2017 |
| 23 May 13 | 97 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,872 | $3.30M | $1,763 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2016 |
| 10 Apr 13 | 44 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,753 | $4.25M | $2,424 | ↻ rebuilt ~2011 |
| 28 Jun 12 | 44 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,753 | $3.75M | $2,139 | ↻ rebuilt ~2011 |
| 2 Apr 12 | 69 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,344 | $5.15M | $1,540 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2014 |
| 6 May 11 | 1A Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,823 | $3.37M | $1,848 | – |
| 22 Dec 10 | 23 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 4,128 | $5.28M | $1,279 | – |
| 30 Jul 10 | 47 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 5,377 | $6.20M | $1,153 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2013 |
| 12 Apr 10 | 119 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 3,102 | $3.40M | $1,096 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2012 |
| 4 Mar 10 | 115 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 2,044 | $2.30M | $1,125 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2012 |
| 3 Dec 09 | 115 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 2,045 | $1.80M | $880 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2012 |
| 30 Nov 09 | 119 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 3,104 | $2.80M | $902 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2012 |
| 6 Oct 09 | 44 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,753 | $1.80M | $1,027 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2011 |
| 3 Sep 09 | 111 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,971 | $2.05M | $1,040 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2011 |
| 11 Aug 09 | 14 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,322 | $3.05M | $918 | ↻ later rebuilt ~2011 |
| 30 Jun 09 | 99 Ming Teck Park | Terrace | 1,813 | $1.98M | $1,092 | – |
| 28 May 09 | 43 Ming Teck Park | Semi-D | 3,722 | $3.00M | $806 | – |
Rebuild activity
63 teardown/new-build permissions on record for Ming Teck Park (URA register, 2000–now) (38 new erections, 25 reconstructions) — how fast the street is being rebuilt, from URA Written Permissions:
| Address | Decided | Type | Est. completion | Proposal | URA decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 Ming Teck Park | 2026-05-13 | Reconstruction | ~2027 | PROPOSED RECONSTRUCTION OF AN EXISTING 2-STOREY SEMI-DET | P260326-15H1-Z000 |
| 65 Ming Teck Park | 2025-11-27 | New erection | ~2027 | PROPOSED NEW ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL SEM | P020525-05Z2-Z000 |
| 92 Ming Teck Park | 2024-08-27 | Reconstruction | ~2026 | PROPOSED RECONSTRUCTION TO AN EXISTING 2-STOREY INTERMED | P080224-19H2-Z000 |
| 103 Ming Teck Park | 2024-07-19 | New erection | ~2026 | PROPOSED NEW ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL COR | P100723-12H2-Z000 |
| 54 Ming Teck Park | 2024-04-16 | New erection | ~2025 | PROPOSED NEW ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL INT | P071123-01F2-Z000 |
| 96 Ming Teck Park | 2024-03-20 | New erection | ~2025 | PROPOSED NEW ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL INT | P270821-53H2-E011 |
| 9 Ming Teck Park | 2024-03-01 | New erection | ~2025 | PROPOSED NEW ERECTION OF 2 UNITS OF 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CO | P020923-01E3-Z000 |
| 95 Ming Teck Park | 2023-07-26 | Reconstruction | ~2025 | PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO APPROVED RECONSTRUCTION TO AN EXIS | P210422-51Z1-A011 |
| 27 Ming Teck Park | 2023-07-05 | New erection | ~2025 | PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO APPROVED ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY EN | P061022-60H3-A011 |
| 27 Ming Teck Park | 2023-03-02 | New erection | ~2024 | PROPOSED ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL SEMI-DE | P061022-60H3-Z000 |
| 95 Ming Teck Park | 2022-12-28 | Reconstruction | ~2024 | PROPOSED RECONSTRUCTION TO AN EXISTING 2 STOREY INTERMED | P210422-51Z2-Z000 |
| 4 Ming Teck Park | 2022-09-02 | Reconstruction | ~2024 | PROPOSED RECONSTRUCTION TO AN EXISTING 2-STOREY ENVELOPE | P240522-73C2-Z000 |
| 67 Ming Teck Park | 2022-08-17 | New erection | ~2024 | PROPOSED NEW ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL SEM | P100322-52J2-Z000 |
| 96 Ming Teck Park | 2022-04-08 | New erection | ~2023 | PROPOSED NEW ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL INT | P270821-53H2-Z000 |
| 48 Ming Teck Park | 2021-12-01 | New erection | ~2023 | PROPOSED ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL INTERMD | P310519-19A2-E011 |
| 33 Ming Teck Park | 2021-09-13 | New erection | ~2023 | PROPOSED ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL SEMI-DE | P181018-15F1-E011 |
| 33 Ming Teck Park | 2020-03-09 | New erection | ~2021 | PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO APPROVED ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY EN | P181018-15F1-A011 |
| 63 Ming Teck Park | 2020-02-18 | New erection | ~2021 | PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO APPROVED NEW ERECTION OF A 2-STORE | P120918-01F2-A011 |
| 48 Ming Teck Park | 2019-07-29 | New erection | ~2021 | PROPOSED ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL INTERMD | P310519-19A2-Z000 |
| 33 Ming Teck Park | 2018-11-16 | New erection | ~2020 | PROPOSED ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY ENVELOPE CONTROL SEMI-DE | P181018-15F1-Z000 |
To pull the official notice (the URA decision column is the reference number): open URA SPACE → close the welcome pop-up → type the address in the search bar → click the plot → Development Register → Download Decision Notice. URA has no direct link to a single decision (the download is a one-time session link), so the number above is what you search by. “Est. completion” (permission date + ~18 months) is a proxy for how new the house is — no free bulk TOP registry exists; authoritative TOP/CSC dates need a paid BCA search. “Amendment” rows show when a rebuild plan was last revised. Showing the 20 most recent of 63.
Landed within 1km
57 other landed streets lie within 1km (2,440 caveats in the radius, median $2,194 land $psf) — the comparable pool for a home here:
| Street | Dist | Distance | Median $psf | Caveats |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland Drive | D10 | 0.2 km | $2,362 | 24 |
| Jalan Tenang | D10 | 0.2 km | $2,684 | 16 |
| Queen Astrid Gardens | D10 | 0.2 km | $716 | 7 |
| Jalan Istimewa | D10 | 0.3 km | $2,866 | 26 |
| Jalan Jelita | D10 | 0.3 km | $2,231 | 33 |
| Greenleaf Lane | D10 | 0.3 km | $3,300 | 12 |
| Bukit Sedap Road | D10 | 0.3 km | $662 | 14 |
| Tan Boon Chong Avenue | D10 | 0.4 km | $1,989 | 9 |
| Greenleaf Road | D10 | 0.4 km | $2,555 | 21 |
| Mount Sinai Lane | D10 | 0.4 km | $3,175 | 45 |
| Greenleaf View | D10 | 0.4 km | $2,220 | 75 |
| Holland Grove Road | D10 | 0.4 km | $1,078 | 5 |
| Queen Astrid Park | D10 | 0.5 km | $622 | 24 |
| Moonbeam Terrace | D10 | 0.5 km | $2,006 | 41 |
| Greenleaf Drive | D10 | 0.5 km | $2,370 | 50 |
| Moonbeam Drive | D10 | 0.5 km | $2,040 | 14 |
| Mount Sinai Road | D10 | 0.5 km | $2,792 | 26 |
| Greenleaf Grove | D10 | 0.6 km | $808 | 25 |
| Greenleaf Rise | D10 | 0.6 km | $2,088 | 17 |
| Moonbeam View | D10 | 0.6 km | $2,862 | 21 |
| Grove Lane | D10 | 0.6 km | $1,187 | 7 |
| Greenleaf Avenue | D10 | 0.6 km | $761 | 7 |
| Moonbeam Walk | D10 | 0.6 km | $2,034 | 22 |
| Astrid Hill | D10 | 0.6 km | $2,155 | 19 |
| Mount Sinai View | D10 | 0.6 km | $3,232 | 13 |
| Grove Crescent | D10 | 0.7 km | $1,823 | 16 |
| Greenleaf Place | D10 | 0.7 km | $2,424 | 34 |
| Grove Avenue | D10 | 0.7 km | $2,666 | 28 |
| Grove Drive | D10 | 0.7 km | $2,828 | 74 |
| Holland Road #Xx-Xx | D10 | 0.7 km | $584 | 24 |
| Mount Sinai Plain | D10 | 0.7 km | $1,514 | 4 |
| East Sussex Lane | D10 | 0.7 km | $682 | 10 |
| Mount Sinai Crescent | D10 | 0.7 km | $2,863 | 8 |
| Jalan Pelangi | D10 | 0.7 km | $2,565 | 8 |
| Mount Sinai Avenue | D10 | 0.7 km | $2,252 | 27 |
| Mount Sinai Walk | D10 | 0.7 km | $3,076 | 5 |
| Holland Grove Terrace | D10 | 0.8 km | $774 | 11 |
| Lim Tai See Walk | D10 | 0.8 km | $1,850 | 34 |
| Jalan Harum | D10 | 0.8 km | $2,425 | 8 |
| Holland Grove Lane | D10 | 0.8 km | $2,123 | 6 |
Showing the nearest 40 of 57 streets within 1km.
Investor angle
Price a home on Ming Teck Park against the street’s own caveats first, then the 1km pool above — same-type, similar land size. Value a specific plot with the valuation tool, see the wider District 10 landed profile, or step back to the landed overview.
How is this worked out? — data, radius & limits
Transactions
All landed caveats recorded on Ming Teck Park, from URA caveat data; $psf on land area.
Radius
Adaptive: the comparable ring starts at 1km and widens to 2km then 3km only if fewer than 12 landed streets fall inside — so dense areas stay tight and thin ones keep enough comps. Here it is 1km. Straight-line from geocoded street midpoints (OneMap); street-level precision, not door-to-door.
Rebuild
URA Written Permissions (Planning_Decision) for new erections + reconstructions — matched to this street, and in the transactions table to the exact address. Est. completion = decision date + ~18 months, a proxy for build recency: no free bulk TOP registry exists, so authoritative TOP/CSC needs a paid BCA search. The decision number lets you retrieve the official notice from URA SPACE (URA has no direct per-decision link).
Limits: caveats are optional and some addresses are masked; a thin street can swing on one sale; distances are as-the-crow-flies. Directional, not a valuation.
For educational purposes only — not financial advice.