HomeResearch › Executive Condos (EC): the investor & buyer guide
Updated 11 Jul 2026 ยท Executive Condominium analysis

Executive Condos (EC): the investor & buyer guide

TL;DR
-4%
Resale EC vs nearest same-era condos (median)
-20%
At launch, new-sale EC vs nearby new condos
~17 pts
Gap the first owner captures over the MOP
53
ECs matched to neighbourhood peers
A resale EC is one of the best-value ways into private-condo living. Because in the long run an EC trades on par with the private condos around it — street-for-street, the typical resale EC is only about 4% off its nearest same-era neighbours, and for many it’s nil or a premium. Yet it was sold ~20% cheaper at launch by policy design. That gap is the opportunity: a first owner captures the ~17-point catch-up over the MOP, and a resale buyer still gets near-identical product (facilities, OCR location, SC/PR buyer pool) at a small, closing discount. This page maps the whole EC opportunity — what’s launching, what’s reaching MOP, and how every resale EC is priced against its area.

Executive condos launching soon

The upcoming EC pipeline — buy at launch (subject to the income ceiling and a 5-year wait) to capture the first-owner catch-up:

Upcoming EC launchLocationUnitsExpected
Jurong East Avenue 1Jurong East · D22735 units2026
Coastal CabanaPasir Ris · D18748 units2026
Rivelle @ TampinesTampines West · D18560 units2026
Otto PlaceTengah · D24600 units2026

From the new-launch pipeline. Buying at launch means the income-ceiling wait and the 5-year MOP — but it is where the first-owner catch-up (~20 points) is captured. Indicative; confirm with the developer.

Fresh off MOP — the newest resale ECs

ECs that have just completed and are hitting their 5-year MOP are the freshest resale opportunities — newly open to Singaporean/PR buyers, and where the launch-to-resale catch-up is still playing out. Each is priced against its area on our fair-value model:

EC — recently completedMOP (resale to SC/PR)$psfFair value vs area
Rivercove Residences
TOP 2020 · D19
MOP reached$1,628fair +4%
Hundred Palms Residences
TOP 2019 · D19
MOP reached$1,842rich +17%
Inz Residence
TOP 2019 · D23
MOP reached$1,424
Northwave
TOP 2019 · D25
MOP reached$1,268undervalued -11%
Parc Life
TOP 2018 · D27
MOP reached$1,350-5%
Sol Acres
TOP 2018 · D23
MOP reached$1,467-5%
The Criterion
TOP 2018 · D27
MOP reached$1,302fair +1%
The Visionaire
TOP 2018 · D27
MOP reached$1,411fair +2%
Treasure Crest
TOP 2018 · D19
MOP reached$1,461fair -1%
Wandervale
TOP 2018 · D23
MOP reached$1,488fair +6%
Bellewaters
TOP 2017 · D19
MOP reached$1,461fair -3%
Bellewoods
TOP 2017 · D25
MOP reached$1,295fair +4%
Signature At Yishun
TOP 2017 · D27
MOP reached$1,265fair -1%
The Brownstone
TOP 2017 · D27
MOP reached$1,436fair -1%
The Terrace
TOP 2017 · D19
MOP reached$1,421-6%
The Vales
TOP 2017 · D19
MOP reached$1,552fair -1%
Westwood Residences
TOP 2017 · D22
MOP reached$1,355undervalued -16%
Citylife@Tampines
TOP 2016 · D18
MOP reached$1,548fair +4%
Ecopolitan
TOP 2016 · D19
MOP reached$1,357fair +0%
Forestville
TOP 2016 · D25
MOP reached$1,185-4%
Lake Life
TOP 2016 · D22
MOP reached$1,448undervalued -19%
Lush Acres
TOP 2016 · D28
MOP reached$1,388-6%
Sea Horizon
TOP 2016 · D18
MOP reached$1,268-6%
Skypark Residences
TOP 2016 · D27
MOP reached$1,384fair +1%
The Amore
TOP 2016 · D19
MOP reached$1,439-6%
The Topiary
TOP 2016 · D28
MOP reached$1,464fair +4%
Twin Fountains
TOP 2016 · D25
MOP reached$1,300
Waterbay
TOP 2016 · D19
MOP reached$1,430undervalued -8%

These are the freshest resale ECs — just past (or nearing) their 5-year MOP, so newly open to Singaporean/PR resale buyers. “Fair value vs area” is how each trades against its nearest same-era condos on our fair-value model.

Why we compare by neighbourhood, not district

Singaporeans don’t shop by URA district — they compare a home against the other projects in the same area. Districts are far too coarse for that: District 19 alone stretches from Serangoon to Hougang, Sengkang and Punggol, with very different price levels inside it. ECs tend to sit in the more affordable pockets, so a district-wide comparison unfairly pits them against better-sited condos and overstates the EC discount. Every number on this page instead matches each EC to the private condos closest to it on the map (same 99-year tenure, similar age and unit size).

Why ECs launch cheap

The Executive Condominium is a deliberate rung on Singapore’s housing ladder. ECs are built by private developers on state land sold at a concession and sold only to buyers under an income ceiling, with CPF grants for eligible first-timers. In exchange for the subsidy they carry a Minimum Occupation Period (MOP) and a privatisation timeline. That subsidy is why a brand-new EC lists well under the private condo next door — not because the building is inferior, but because the buyer pool and the land price were capped by policy. (See the URA and MND for the current rules.)

The MOP & privatisation timeline

StageExisting ECs (sites before 8 May 2026)New EC sites (tendered on/after 8 May 2026)
Minimum Occupation Period5 years — cannot sell/rent whole unit before this10 years
Resale market after MOPOpen to Singaporeans & PRsSame (from year 10)
Privatisation (fully private)10 years — then open to foreigners & companies15 years

At the first MOP the unit can be resold to Singaporeans and PRs — and because ECs sit almost entirely in the OCR, where SC/PR owner-occupiers and HDB upgraders are the natural buyers, that is the threshold that unlocks the bulk of demand. Full privatisation later adds foreigners and companies. By then most of the catch-up to nearby private prices has already happened.

Launch discount vs resale gap (neighbourhood-matched)

EC $psf relative to nearby same-era private condos. Launch = new-sale; resale = past-5-year resale, matched by map proximity.
At launch (new sale)
-20%
In resale (neighbourhood)
-4%

The neighbourhood gap at every project age

For every age where enough ECs exist, we match each one to the private condos closest to it (within ~1.2 km, widened where an area is sparse), of similar age and unit size, and take the median $psf gap. 0% is parity. Gaps in the line are ages where Singapore simply didn’t launch ECs; the orange dashed line is the trend.

EC vs nearest same-era condos — by year of age

Cross-sectional; hollow points = thin (<3 EC projects at that age). Median across ages โ‰ˆ -4%.
+11%+9%+7%+5%+3%+1%-1%-3%-5%-7%-9%7810121416182022242627Project age, years-6%+9%-5%-7%EC $psf vs nearest same-era condos — 0% = parity·· trend
Project ageEC vs nearby condosEC projects
7 yr-6.2%2
8 yr+9.1%5
9 yr+2.7%5
10 yr-4.9%9
11 yr-7.2%5
12 yr-5.2%6
13 yr+9.5%2
21 yr+9.7%2
22 yr-2.6%2
23 yr+3.4%3
26 yr-2.2%4
27 yr-7.0%5

The line sits around parity — oscillating from roughly −7% to +10% with no downward march. Some cohorts print a premium (strong, well-sited ECs); a few sit modestly below. There is no widening “class discount” once you compare like-for-like on location — the trend is essentially flat (1.8 points per decade).

Two worked case studies: same street, same era

The fair test is the one a buyer actually faces — the EC versus the private condos on the same stretch of road, built in the same years. Two examples, matched by map distance:

EC Heron Bay vs nearest same-era condos Sengkang riverside
Heron Bay ’15
$1,332 EC
$1,371 -3%
$1,455 -8%
$1,441 -8%
$1,378 -3%
Median resale $psf, past ~12 months (URA). EC vs neighbours: -8% to -3%. A 99-year EC beside a cluster of same-era condos. Against its immediate neighbours the gap is only low single digits — and it closes further on the newest, best-located blocks.
EC Sol Acres vs nearest same-era condos Choa Chu Kang / Yew Tee
Sol Acres ’18
$1,467 EC
Hillsta ’16
$1,352 +9%
$1,347 +9%
$1,772 -17%
Median resale $psf, past ~12 months (URA). EC vs neighbours: -17% to +9%. A 1,327-unit mega-EC. Against the ordinary condos around it, Sol Acres trades at parity or a premium — only the MRT/mall-integrated project nearby out-prices it. Scale and facilities matter more than the EC label.
The “EC discount” is mostly a location mix. Averaged across a whole district it looks like several percent, because ECs cluster in the cheaper pockets. Put an EC next to its actual same-era neighbours and it all but disappears — low single digits for Heron Bay, a premium for the mega-EC Sol Acres.

What this means for a buyer

Buying new (at launch): the biggest, most reliable gain in the EC story is the first-owner catch-up — but it is locked up for the MOP and gated by the income ceiling.

Buying resale: you skip the wait and the eligibility test, and you get near-identical product at, or very close to, the price of the condo beside it. Treat the two as the same asset class — which is why our undervalued screen values resale ECs against private condos and labels them EC.

The nuance: judge an EC against the condos on its own street, not a district average. Scale, facilities and micro-location move the number far more than the EC label does.

Every resale EC — priced against its area

The full list, newest at the top, oldest at the bottom. For each Executive Condominium: its recent $psf, our fair-value read vs the area (undervalued = trading below its nearest same-era condos on the fair-value model; rich = above), and the three private condos closest to it with the $psf gap and map distance. Sort your eye down the Fair value column to find the resale ECs trading cheapest against their surroundings.

Executive Condominium$psfFair value vs area3 nearest comparable private condos — $psf, gap, distance
Rivercove Residences
EC · 2020 · D19
$1,628fair +4%
H2O Residences ’15$1,430 +14% 370m
Riverbank @ Fernvale ’17$1,444 +13% 386m
Rivertrees Residences ’17$1,522 +7% 388m
Hundred Palms Residences
EC · 2019 · D19
$1,842rich +17%
Terrasse ’14$1,496 +23% 475m
Affinity At Serangoon ’23$1,864 -1% 859m
The Garden Residences ’21$1,829 +1% 1,088m
Inz Residence
EC · 2019 · D23
$1,424
Mi Casa ’12$1,251 +14% 1,408m
Hillsta ’16$1,352 +5% 1,901m
Le Quest ’20$1,642 -13% 2,059m
Northwave
EC · 2019 · D25
$1,268undervalued -11%
The Nautical ’15$1,224 +4% 1,568m
The Commodore ’24$1,739 -27% 1,880m
Canberra Residences ’13$1,187 +7% 2,187m
Parc Life
EC · 2018 · D27
$1,350-5%
The Nautical ’15$1,224 +10% 662m
The Commodore ’24$1,739 -22% 988m
Canberra Residences ’13$1,187 +14% 1,356m
Sol Acres
EC · 2018 · D23
$1,467-5%
Hillsta ’16$1,352 +9% 676m
The Tennery ’14$1,347 +9% 1,156m
Kingsford Hillview Peak ’17$1,471 +0% 2,020m
The Criterion
EC · 2018 · D27
$1,302fair +1%
Skies Miltonia ’16$1,250 +4% 229m
The Miltonia Residences ’14$1,186 +10% 416m
The Wisteria ’18$1,381 -6% 496m
The Visionaire
EC · 2018 · D27
$1,411fair +2%
The Nautical ’15$1,224 +15% 339m
The Commodore ’24$1,739 -19% 561m
Canberra Residences ’13$1,187 +19% 645m
Treasure Crest
EC · 2018 · D19
$1,461fair -1%
La Fiesta ’16$1,680 -13% 1,091m
A Treasure Trove ’15$1,584 -8% 1,106m
The Luxurie ’15$1,539 -5% 1,128m
Wandervale
EC · 2018 · D23
$1,488fair +6%
Mi Casa ’12$1,251 +19% 191m
Yewtee Residences ’08$1,050 +42% 1,593m
Bellewaters
EC · 2017 · D19
$1,461fair -3%
A Treasure Trove ’15$1,584 -8% 1,137m
Riverbank @ Fernvale ’17$1,444 +1% 1,208m
La Fiesta ’16$1,680 -13% 1,272m
Bellewoods
EC · 2017 · D25
$1,295fair +4%
Rosewood Suites ’11$1,051 +23% 1,692m
Woodhaven ’15$1,304 -1% 1,857m
Signature At Yishun
EC · 2017 · D27
$1,265fair -1%
Skies Miltonia ’16$1,250 +1% 361m
The Wisteria ’18$1,381 -8% 441m
The Miltonia Residences ’14$1,186 +7% 476m
The Brownstone
EC · 2017 · D27
$1,436fair -1%
The Nautical ’15$1,224 +17% 442m
Canberra Residences ’13$1,187 +21% 503m
The Commodore ’24$1,739 -17% 537m
The Terrace
EC · 2017 · D19
$1,421-6%
River Isles ’15$1,449 -2% 533m
Flo Residence ’16$1,358 +5% 1,008m
Parc Centros ’16$1,666 -15% 1,299m
The Vales
EC · 2017 · D19
$1,552fair -1%
La Fiesta ’16$1,680 -8% 865m
The Luxurie ’15$1,539 +1% 902m
A Treasure Trove ’15$1,584 -2% 1,201m
Westwood Residences
EC · 2017 · D22
$1,355undervalued -16%
The Centris ’09$1,630 -17% 1,705m
Citylife@Tampines
EC · 2016 · D18
$1,548fair +4%
The Vision ’14$1,590 -3% 917m
D'Nest ’17$1,485 +4% 1,095m
The Palette ’15$1,522 +2% 1,193m
Ecopolitan
EC · 2016 · D19
$1,357fair +0%
A Treasure Trove ’15$1,584 -14% 609m
Parc Centros ’16$1,666 -19% 830m
The Luxurie ’15$1,539 -12% 1,250m
Forestville
EC · 2016 · D25
$1,185-4%
Rosewood Suites ’11$1,051 +13% 1,406m
Lake Life
EC · 2016 · D22
$1,448undervalued -19%
The Lakefront Residences ’14$1,684 -14% 1,373m
Caspian ’12$1,520 -5% 1,381m
The Lakeshore ’08$1,480 -2% 1,540m
Lush Acres
EC · 2016 · D28
$1,388-6%
Rivertrees Residences ’17$1,522 -9% 152m
Riverbank @ Fernvale ’17$1,444 -4% 219m
H2O Residences ’15$1,430 -3% 266m
Sea Horizon
EC · 2016 · D18
$1,268-6%
Sea Esta ’15$1,321 -4% 128m
Coastal Breeze Residences ’12$1,118 +13% 249m
Seastrand ’14$1,282 -1% 263m
Skypark Residences
EC · 2016 · D27
$1,384fair +1%
The Nautical ’15$1,224 +13% 545m
Canberra Residences ’13$1,187 +17% 1,307m
Eight Courtyards ’14$1,310 +6% 1,312m
The Amore
EC · 2016 · D19
$1,439-6%
River Isles ’15$1,449 -1% 222m
Flo Residence ’16$1,358 +6% 798m
Parc Centros ’16$1,666 -14% 999m
The Topiary
EC · 2016 · D28
$1,464fair +4%
The Greenwich ’14$1,327 +10% 316m
Seletar Park Residence ’15$1,324 +11% 405m
High Park Residences ’19$1,620 -10% 768m
Twin Fountains
EC · 2016 · D25
$1,300
Rosewood Suites ’11$1,051 +24% 1,484m
Woodhaven ’15$1,304 +0% 1,659m
Waterbay
EC · 2016 · D19
$1,430undervalued -8%
Parc Centros ’16$1,666 -14% 474m
River Isles ’15$1,449 -1% 673m
A Treasure Trove ’15$1,584 -10% 1,036m
1 Canberra
EC · 2015 · D27
$1,271-7%
Eight Courtyards ’14$1,310 -3% 94m
The Commodore ’24$1,739 -27% 508m
The Nautical ’15$1,224 +4% 839m
Heron Bay
EC · 2015 · D19
$1,332-6%
Boathouse Residences ’15$1,371 -3% 118m
Riversails ’16$1,441 -8% 169m
Riversound Residence ’15$1,378 -3% 511m
The Rainforest
EC · 2015 · D23
$1,409fair +6%
Mi Casa ’12$1,251 +13% 43m
Yewtee Residences ’08$1,050 +34% 1,505m
The Tampines Trilliant
EC · 2015 · D18
$1,664rich +13%
The Vision ’14$1,590 +5% 915m
D'Nest ’17$1,485 +12% 1,161m
The Palette ’15$1,522 +9% 1,243m
Twin Waterfalls
EC · 2015 · D19
$1,504fair +3%
A Treasure Trove ’15$1,584 -5% 464m
Parc Centros ’16$1,666 -10% 814m
The Luxurie ’15$1,539 -2% 1,438m
Waterwoods
EC · 2015 · D19
$1,424-8%
Flo Residence ’16$1,358 +5% 210m
River Isles ’15$1,449 -2% 704m
Riversound Residence ’15$1,378 +3% 1,563m
Arc At Tampines
EC · 2014 · D18
$1,382-6%
Q Bay Residences ’16$1,480 -7% 67m
The Santorini ’17$1,447 -4% 208m
Waterview ’14$1,482 -7% 299m
Austville Residences
EC · 2014 · D19
$1,345-5%
Riversound Residence ’15$1,378 -2% 159m
Riversails ’16$1,441 -7% 362m
Boathouse Residences ’15$1,371 -2% 649m
Belysa
EC · 2014 · D18
$1,384fair -1%
Livia ’11$1,270 +9% 128m
Nv Residences ’13$1,338 +3% 300m
Oasis @ Elias ’11$1,167 +19% 401m
Blossom Residences
EC · 2014 · D23
$1,280undervalued -8%
Eco Sanctuary ’16$1,647 -22% 2,204m
Foresque Residences ’14$1,579 -19% 2,441m
Mi Casa ’12$1,251 +2% 2,455m
Riverparc Residence
EC · 2014 · D19
$1,442rich +8%
River Isles ’15$1,449 +0% 536m
Flo Residence ’16$1,358 +6% 719m
Parc Centros ’16$1,666 -13% 1,614m
The Canopy
EC · 2014 · D27
$1,140-7%
Skies Miltonia ’16$1,250 -9% 649m
The Miltonia Residences ’14$1,186 -4% 784m
The Wisteria ’18$1,381 -17% 1,010m
Watercolours
EC · 2014 · D18
$1,232undervalued -10%
Seastrand ’14$1,282 -4% 148m
Sea Esta ’15$1,321 -7% 191m
Lighthouse ’04$823 +50% 318m
Esparina Residences
EC · 2013 · D19
$1,652rich +20%
Jewel @ Buangkok ’16$1,717 -4% 171m
The Quartz ’09$1,474 +12% 294m
La Fiesta ’16$1,680 -2% 961m
Prive
EC · 2013 · D19
$1,511rich +9%
Eight Courtyards ’14$1,310 +15% 94m
The Nautical ’15$1,224 +23% 839m
North Park Residences ’18$1,850 -18% 1,178m
La Casa
EC · 2008 · D25
$1,040fair -1%
Casablanca ’05$1,097 -5% 1,293m
Rosewood Suites ’11$1,051 -1% 1,337m
Rosewood ’03$1,058 -2% 1,389m
The Quintet
EC · 2006 · D23
$1,050fair -3%
Regent Grove ’00$1,001 +5% 252m
Yewtee Residences ’08$1,050 +0% 507m
Northvale ’98$1,096 -4% 1,367m
The Esparis
EC · 2005 · D18
$1,108-5%
Seastrand ’14$1,282 -14% 744m
Sea Esta ’15$1,321 -16% 879m
Lighthouse ’04$823 +35% 1,002m
Whitewater
EC · 2005 · D18
$1,108undervalued -9%
Oasis @ Elias ’11$1,167 -5% 837m
Livia ’11$1,270 -13% 1,122m
Nv Residences ’13$1,338 -17% 1,300m
Nuovo
EC · 2004 · D20
$1,304undervalued -12%
Castle Green ’97$1,320 -1% 188m
Grandeur 8 ’05$1,423 -8% 1,115m
Centro Residences ’14$1,984 -34% 1,699m
Park Green
EC · 2004 · D19
$1,110-3%
Hougang Green ’98$984 +13% 314m
The Quartz ’09$1,474 -25% 966m
Seletar Springs Condominium ’00$1,030 +8% 1,001m
Bishan Loft
EC · 2003 · D20
$1,672fair +3%
Bishan 8 ’99$1,684 -1% 622m
Rafflesia Condominium ’03$1,582 +6% 972m
Chiltern Park ’95$1,502 +11% 1,112m
Lilydale
EC · 2003 · D27
$928undervalued -13%
Spring Grove ’96$1,800 -48% 798m
Orchid Park Condominium ’94$1,002 -7% 2,045m
The Estuary ’13$1,303 -29% 2,382m
The Dew
EC · 2003 · D23
$990undervalued -9%
Regent Heights ’99$1,057 -6% 634m
Hillview Regency ’06$1,179 -16% 715m
The Jade ’04$1,358 -27% 820m
The Eden At Tampines
EC · 2003 · D18
$1,180rich +10%
Changi Rise Condominium ’04$1,120 +5% 750m
Savannah Condopark ’05$1,144 +3% 800m
Melville Park ’96$924 +28% 959m
Northoaks
EC · 2000 · D25
$897
Sun Plaza ’00$800 +12% 1,504m
Summerdale
EC · 2000 · D22
$990undervalued -13%
Lakeholmz ’05$1,271 -22% 542m
Parc Vista ’98$1,139 -13% 717m
The Centris ’09$1,630 -39% 806m
The Floravale
EC · 2000 · D22
$1,070
The Centris ’09$1,630 -34% 1,482m
Lakeholmz ’05$1,271 -16% 2,374m
Parc Vista ’98$1,139 -6% 2,418m
The Florida
EC · 2000 · D19
$1,051-6%
Rio Vista ’04$1,137 -8% 146m
Evergreen Park ’99$1,095 -4% 645m
The Quartz ’09$1,474 -29% 1,130m
The Rivervale
EC · 2000 · D19
$1,113-7%
The Quartz ’09$1,474 -24% 551m
Rio Vista ’04$1,137 -2% 861m
Hougang Green ’98$984 +13% 1,250m
Woodsvale
EC · 2000 · D25
$899
Sun Plaza ’00$800 +12% 1,601m
Yew Mei Green
EC · 2000 · D23
$1,063fair +7%
Yewtee Residences ’08$1,050 +1% 576m
Regent Grove ’00$1,001 +6% 609m
Northvale ’98$1,096 -3% 1,006m
Chestervale
EC · 1999 · D23
$1,000undervalued -32%
Maysprings ’98$1,170 -15% 1,233m
Eastvale
EC · 1999 · D18
$1,046fair +0%
Lighthouse ’04$823 +27% 759m
Sandy Palm ’02$770 +36% 817m
Elias Green ’94$962 +9% 1,284m
Pinevale
EC · 1999 · D18
$1,080undervalued -8%
The Tropica ’00$1,294 -17% 1,325m
Elias Green ’94$962 +12% 1,698m
Aquarius By The Park ’01$1,324 -18% 2,324m
Simei Green Condominium
EC · 1999 · D18
$1,094undervalued -10%
Tropical Spring ’02$1,214 -10% 301m
Modena ’01$1,223 -11% 425m
Melville Park ’96$924 +18% 620m
Westmere
EC · 1999 · D22
$1,121-7%
Parc Oasis ’94$1,215 -8% 699m
The Mayfair ’00$1,212 -8% 904m
The Lakeshore ’08$1,480 -24% 1,797m
Windermere
EC · 1999 · D23
$960undervalued -10%
Regent Grove ’00$1,001 -4% 250m
Yewtee Residences ’08$1,050 -9% 453m
Northvale ’98$1,096 -12% 1,296m
How is this worked out? — data, proximity matching, caveats
Universe
Resale transactions on 99-year leasehold stock only (ECs are all 99LH), URA 5-year window, en-bloc & price/size outliers removed. Every EC here is past its first MOP.
Neighbourhood match
Each EC is matched to private condos nearest to it on the map (haversine on project coordinates), within ~1.2 km (widened to 2 km where sparse), completion within ~5–6 years and unit size within ~35%. Gap = EC median $psf ÷ nearest-peers median − 1. No district buckets are used — districts are too coarse for how homes are actually compared.
Launch gap
New-sale EC vs new-sale nearby condos of the same era (small sample; corroborates the documented policy subsidy).
Note: $psf levels, not total return; a first owner’s actual gain also depends on entry price and holding period. Some ECs in isolated estates have few nearby same-era condos and are dropped.
For educational purposes only — not financial advice.