HomeCondos › FOUR SEASONS PARK

FOUR SEASONS PARK

Cuscaden Walk · D10 River Valley
CondominiumFreehold
$3,454 psf
median $psf
$5.41
median rent · psf/mo
~1.9%
gross rental yield
26
highest floor
202
total units
1994
TOP / completion
Median $psf excludes ground & top-floor units · basis: last 12 months. Median rent from 40 URA rental contracts (last 12 mo).
25
/ 100
HomeVestor Investor Score
Best for: Capital growth
Watch out for: Priced above nearby projects
Data confidence: Medium · overall risk: Low
Yield0
Cashflow
Liquidity39
Growth61
Value0
Family25
How is this worked out? — this project’s 5 sub-scores, from its own data
Each sub-score is 0–100 (higher = better), built from this project’s actual figures — here are the exact drivers behind each one.
Value vs fair · 0
Trades ~49% above fair value ($3,525 vs $2,364 modelled) → 0
Capital growth · 61
Nearest growth node: CBD Rejuvenation (Shenton / Anson) — ~3.6 km away (under construction) → 42 · Nearest MRT ~403 m (Orchard) → 80 · Price momentum — too few recent sales to score  =  average
Rental yield · 0
Gross rental yield 1.9% on a 2.0–4.5% band → 0
Exit liquidity · 39
202 units → 17 · 5 sales in 12 mo → 13 · 40 rental contracts → 88  =  average
Family demand · 25
No primary school within 1 km → 25
Overall · 25
The average of the 5 sub-scores above.
Risk flags
Priced above nearby projects — ~53% above the median $psf of 352 projects within ~2.0 km
Note: risk flags are screening signals from the data — not confirmed defects; check each against the actual unit, title & MCST.
A screening heuristic — not financial advice; verify every figure and your own budget before transacting.
Investor verdict

Four Seasons Park is a freehold project in D10 River Valley with 1.9% gross yield, thin liquidity. It sits ~3.6 km from its nearest growth node (CBD Rejuvenation (Shenton / Anson)) — beyond the ~3 km impact band.

Best suited for
  • Capital growth buyers
Less suited for
  • pure rental-yield investors
Key due-diligence
  • Confirm the exact unit stack, facing and floor — our figures are project medians.
  • Stress-test cashflow at +1–2% interest in the calculator below.

Investment report

A plain-language read on Four Seasons Park — genuine strengths, honest risks, an independent fair-value range and a Buy / Watch / Avoid position, all from the data above.

Why this may work
  • Active rental market — 40 recent lease contracts at a healthy ~1.9% gross yield.
  • Well-sized 202-unit project — larger developments trade at firmer $psf and resell faster.
  • Orchard MRT Station MRT within ~403 m — walkable transit underpins rent and resale.
  • Freehold — no lease decay, so strong long-horizon holding power.
Why this may fail / what to watch
  • Entry $psf sits ~53% above nearby projects (within ~2.0 km) — a location/quality premium that has to keep being earned.
  • Thin liquidity (5 sales/12 mo) — a slower, choppier exit and a softer price signal.
  • High quantum (typical unit ~$7,498,680) narrows the resale buyer pool.
  • Check nearby new-launch & upcoming TOP supply — a fresh project within walking distance can cap rents and resale for a few years.
Signals screened from the data — strengths and risks, not confirmed facts. For educational purposes only — not financial advice.

How Four Seasons Park compares in D10

The nearest comparable D10 condos — matched on size, age, MRT distance and building height. Our fair-value model puts Four Seasons Park at about $2,364 psf; it trades at $3,525 psf, ~49% above that — Above fair value.

Cuscaden Residences150 units · 2002 · comparable$2,704 psf
The Paterson88 units · 2004 · comparable$2,441 psf
Paterson Residence110 units · 2008 · comparable$2,878 psf
Four Seasons Park — this project$3,525 psf

Comparables trade near their own fair value, so they anchor the level. A gap is a research lead, not a valuation — see the full screen.

Fair-value range

Several independent value bases — more informative than a single median. The combined range weights the project-specific bases most.

Recent project median $psfexcludes ground & top-floor units$3,454 psf
Same-size, recent compsfloor of ±25% size band, recency-weighted$3,318 psf
Nearby projectsmedian $psf of projects within ~2.0 km$2,253 psf
Rental-yield-supportedrent $psf × 12 ÷ 3.0% target gross yield$2,164 psf
HomeVestor fair range$2,428–$3,153 psf
≈ $5,487,280–$7,125,780 for a ~2,260 sqft unit

See the D10 comparables behind that district base on the map below — switch on “District condos by $psf” in the layers (this project vs cheaper/pricier neighbours).

How is this worked out? — the value bases & combined range
Project median
Recency-filtered median $psf of this project’s own resale caveats (ground & top-floor units excluded).
Same-size comps
Recency-weighted median $psf of caveats within ±25% of the typical unit size (6-mo full, 6–12-mo 70%, 12–24-mo 40%) — the comparable-sales method used in our Valuation tool.
District-comparable
Median $psf across all projects in the same district — a market-level sanity check (a genuinely superior project can sit above it).
Yield-supported
The $psf at which today’s median rent would return a 3.0% target gross yield for a CCR project — anchors price to rental fundamentals.
Combined range
A weighted blend (comps 28%, yield 28%, project median 22%, district 22%); the band width (±5–13%) reflects how far the independent bases disagree, so a genuinely over- or under-priced project sits outside it.
Note: a project-level estimate — a specific unit’s floor, facing and size shift its fair value. Check a specific unit’s price ›
For educational purposes only — not financial advice.

Buy · Watch · Avoid

Where the project’s current median $psf sits against its fair range, overlaid with the risk signals. An educational classification — not a recommendation.

BUY — below fair
WATCH — around fair
AVOID — above fair
Avoid zoneCurrent median $3,454 psf sits above the fair range — the risk/reward looks stretched at today’s pricing.
Compares project medians to a computed fair range — individual units vary. For educational purposes only — not financial advice.

Price trend

6-month rolling median $psf · excludes ground & top floor

Long-run trend — project vs. market

Indexed to 100 at 2021 · 2021–2026

Long-run line = URA Private Residential Property Price Index (indexed market trend, not unit prices). Markers = actual transactions, past 5 years. Source: URA via data.gov.sg, SODL v1.0.

Zeroing in on one unit? Check if it’s fairly priced ›  ·  Work out what to offer ›

Location & neighbourhood

Tap any label below the map to show or hide that layer, or use Show / hide all. On by default: primary schools, MRT stations within 2 km (nearest highlighted), and hawker / malls / supermarkets. Off by default (tap to switch on): Secondary / JC / Poly, international schools, bus stops, healthcare and childcare.

Nearest MRT: Orchard MRT Station · ~403 m. Amenities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), tiles © CARTO.

About this project

Project NameFOUR SEASONS PARK
Street NameCuscaden Walk
Property TypeCondominium
TenureFreehold
District / Planning AreaD10 / River Valley
Completion1994
Number of units202 units
Highest floor in the project26
Developer
Land Area (sqm)27,844
Master Plan Plot Ratio2.8

All transactions (23)

Newest first. Click any column heading to sort. Ground & top-floor units are excluded from the median above.

e.g. 20-07 · 20- = storey 20 · -07 = stack 07
both optional
Date Address Size
(sqft)
$psf Price
Show

Rental transactions (242)

Individual private-residential lease contracts, newest first — official URA Data Service. Size is URA’s banded floor area (sqft); the unit number and floor are not disclosed. Click any column heading to sort.

6-month rolling median $psf/month · from individual URA rental contracts

URA records the size band & bedroom count, not the unit number.
Lease date Size
(sqft)
Beds Monthly rent $psf/mo
Show
CalculateMortgage